Photo of Matthew De Lio

Matthew De Lio

Subscribe to Matthew De Lio's Posts
Follow:Read more about Matthew De LioMatthew's Linkedin Profile

Special thanks to our summer student Brianna Grieff for contributing to this update.

If you are an employer suddenly ambushed by a union certification application, your immediate questions are likely: what exactly is happening, and what should I do next? Briefly, you should immediately seek legal advice due to the tight timeline you have to respond. This article covers three critical aspects of the union certification process in Ontario: (1) what the process is; (2) the general timeline of events; and (3) employer best practices.

1. The Union Certification Process

During this process, a union seeks to become the official bargaining agent for a defined group of employees. In Ontario, the process is overseen by the Ontario Labour Relations Board (the “Board”) and is governed by the Labour Relations Act, 1995 and the Ontario Labour Relations Board Rules of Procedure.

There are four main stages:

(1) Union Organizing Campaign: The applicant union campaigns to seek out employee support in the proposed bargaining unit to get union membership cards signed.

(2) Application for Certification: Once a sufficient number of membership cards are collected, the union files an application with the Ontario Labour Relations Board to be certified as the bargaining agent for the employees.

(3) Representation Vote: The employees vote against or in favour of the union.

(4) Dispute Resolution: Any disputes related to the application – such as the composition of the bargaining unit or concerns with conduct during the campaign – are resolved by the Board.

2. Timeline

This section provides a quick breakdown of the four main steps. We highlight elements that employers should be aware of.Continue Reading Union Drive Incoming? Your Crash Course on Union Certification in Ontario

Special thanks to our summer student Brianna Grieff for contributing to this update.

With an uncertain economy amidst tariff concerns, Canadians continue to make bolder workforce demands. Although many workers have returned to pre-pandemic attitudes, notable union activity remains rampant across Canadian workforces. For example, over the past 18 months, Canada Post has faced ongoing negotiations and strike notices from the union that represents 55,000 postal workers. On July 5th, 10,000 LCBO employees walked off the job, demanding higher wages and improved benefits. Finally, the professors at McGill University’s Faculty of Law made headlines by striking for five weeks in support of their right to unionize.

Employers are justifiably concerned about the potential for increased union activity, which can cause significant disruptions to operations. There are many strategies employers can use to stay union free, but it requires treading carefully, as labour laws offer extensive protections to employees’ right to unionize. One wrong step by an employer can lead to penalties, fines, and automatic union certification.

Understanding how quickly the 3-step certification process unfolds

The certification process formalizes the collective bargaining relationship. And, understanding how this process works and appreciating how quickly it can move forward is essential for developing an effective union avoidance strategy.

The process for certification in Ontario involves three steps:

1. The Organizing Drive

First, the union will try to keep the organizing drive a secret. During this period, the union will typically attempt to gauge employee interest by having union representatives approach them at the workplace, typically while they are coming to or leaving work, as well as online. Union representatives will talk to employees about any issues they may have with the workplace and share the union’s contact information with them. Union organizing drives usually involve signing up employees as union members and collecting union membership cards. One way that unions target employers for a union drive is by obtaining the names, contact information, and/or home addresses of the employees of a certain workforce, which they use to send them propaganda.Continue Reading Best Practices for Employers Experiencing Labour Union Activity

As part of our newly launched Doing Business in Canada Guide 2025, Chapter 13 on Labour and Employment offers a comprehensive overview of the legal landscape that governs the Canadian workplace. Whether your organization operates under federal jurisdiction or within one of Canada’s provinces or territories, understanding the dual framework of employment regulation is…

Special thanks to our articling student Keyonna Trojcak for contributing to this update.

Baker v. Van Dolder’s Home Team Inc., 2025 ONSC 952, following a novel finding in the recent case of Dufault v. The Corporation of the Township of Ignace[1], held, among other findings, that a “without cause” termination provision…

Special thanks to our articling student Andie Hoang for contributing to this update.

As artificial intelligence and its integration into business operations continues to evolve rapidly, many employers are exploring the use of AI systems in a bid to make hiring decisions more efficient and data-driven. “AI” encompasses a wide range of technologies from simple automated resume screening tools and complex machine learning systems to the forward-looking agentic AI – the kind of AI that does tasks independently.

This rise in the use of AI tools in making employment-related decisions has spurred legislators to regulate their use. This has created a minefield of increased legal liability for employers, especially concerning privacy considerations and the potential for these tools to exhibit biased decision-making. This article provides an overview of the current state of legislative developments related to AI in hiring and recruitment in Ontario, federally, and internationally. It also highlights best practices for employers who are considering the adoption of such tools. 

Legislative Developments in Ontario, the Federal Jurisdiction and Beyond

Ontario

On March 21, 2024, Bill 149 – Working for Workers Four Act received Royal Assent as part of a series of legislative initiatives that have been introduced by the Ontario government under the “Working for Workers” banner since 2021. Each piece of legislation in this series seeks to address various contemporary issues within Ontario workplaces through amendments to the Employment Standards Act, 2000 (the “ESA”). Bill 149 brings about a number of additional changes that will be relevant for employers (which are summarized in our blog post), especially relating to the use of AI in the hiring process.

Starting January 1, 2026, employers will be required to disclose in job postings whether they are using artificial intelligence in the hiring process (i.e., if AI is being used to screen, assess or select applicants for the given position). For the Ontario government, the purpose of such disclosure is “to strengthen transparency for job seekers given that there are many unanswered questions about the ethical, legal and privacy implications that these technologies introduce.”Continue Reading Artificial Intelligence, Real Consequences? Legal Considerations for Canadian Employers Using AI Tools in Hiring

In the recent case of Preston v. Cervus Equipment Corporation, Ontario’s Court of Appeal offered employers a friendly reminder that well-drafted settlement documents will survive judicial scrutiny.

Key Takeaways for Clients

Preston underscores the necessity of clear and precise language in settlement agreements. Employers should use broad and inclusive release language that can encompass a wide range of claims, even those not explicitly mentioned. By carefully drafting settlement agreements, employers can ensure that the settlement documents have the intended effect of concluding the employment relationship without courts stepping in to frustrate the finality of the settlement documents.

Background

The case revolves around the interpretation of a release and indemnity clause in the settlement documents signed by Mr. Preston after his termination from Cervus Equipment Corporation. Mr. Preston was employed by Cervus from 2014 to 2018 and participated in the company’s Deferred Share Plan.

Upon his termination without cause in January 2018, Mr. Preston had 4,964.04 vested stock units valued at $75,949.81 and 4,499 unvested stock units. Cervus informed him that his vested stock units could be exercised according to the Plan and offered him a severance package of 15 weeks’ pay in lieu of notice. The parties then discussed and settled the matter. The settlement documents included a broad release of claims, which Mr. Preston signed after receiving independent legal advice.

Notably, the release language in the settlement documents did not specifically refer to the stock plan and vested stock units in question, but did reference that Mr. Preston was releasing all claims connected to his employment, and that he had no entitlement or claim with respect to any bonus, share award, stock option, or similar plan that his employer had offered to him.Continue Reading Ontario’s Court of Appeal Highlights the Importance of Respecting Broad Release Language in Employment Settlement Agreements

In the recent case of Bertsch v. Datastealth Inc., 2024 ONSC 5593 (Bertsch), an Ontario court upheld a termination provision that did not specify every detail. While recent decisions suggest that such provisions may have to be flawless to be enforceable, Bertsch is a welcome decision showing that employers do not necessarily have to meet that high bar to protect themselves.

Key Takeaways

Bertsch reminds employers of the importance of including clear and compliant termination provisions in employment agreements. Ontario employers should review their agreements to ensure they meet the requirements of the Employment Standards Act, 2000 to avoid potential legal challenges. Employers should continue to confirm their termination provisions are:

  1. Clear and unambiguous to avoid disputes and potential invalidation by the courts.
  2. Compliant with the ESA and its regulations.
  3. Inclusive of language stating that compliance with the ESA and whatever other entitlements are listed in the employment agreement satisfy any common law notice of termination or pay in lieu thereof.

Bertsch demonstrates that while courts will continue to closely scrutinize termination provisions in employment agreements, employers must only ensure that the provisions are legal and unambiguous. This provides some relief for Ontario’s employers by indicating that they do not necessarily have to rely on “perfect” termination clauses that reference all scenarios and laws in their employment agreements to enforce them.

Even with this positive decision for employers, we continue to encourage all Canadian employers to assess the enforceability of termination provisions in existing employment agreements.Continue Reading Don’t Let Perfect Be the Enemy of Excellent: Ontario Court Validates Termination Clause that is Unambiguous and Legal

Special thanks to our articling student Andie Hoang for contributing to this update.

In 2022, the Ontario government sought to establish a new legal framework for “digital platform work” through the introduction of the Digital Platform Workers’ Rights Act, 2022. It is now set to come into force on July 1, 2025. The Act, stemming from the Working for Workers Act, 2022, introduces new rights and protections for workers within the gig-economy. Specifically, the Act will apply to workers who perform “digital platform work” (such as ride share, delivery, or courier services) and “operators” who facilitate the performance of digital platform work through a digital platform.

Summary of Significant Changes

In conjunction with the Act, the Government of Ontario has recently published regulations that further clarifies the new rights and obligations under the Act. Key worker rights and new obligations include:

  • Right to a Minimum Wage: Digital platform operations will be required to pay a worker at least the minimum wage rate payable under the Employment Standard Act, 2000 (ESA), exclusive of tips and other gratuities, for each “work assignment” performed. Subject to specific exceptions, a “work assignment” will typically begin when a worker accepts a work assignment through a digital platform and ends when the worker performs the assignment.

Continue Reading A New Gig for Digital Platform Work: Ontario’s Legal Framework for Digital Platform Workers Comes into Force July 1, 2025